Math 2.0

statement theorem

Well-ordering principle

Statement

Every nonempty set of natural numbers has a least element. That is, if A⊆NA \subseteq \mathbb{N} and A≠∅A \neq \emptyset, then there is an aa in AA with a≤xa \le x for each xx in AA.

Remarks

The least element is unique, because the order on N\mathbb{N} is antisymmetric. The principle follows from strong induction, and conversely it implies the principle of mathematical induction. The set of the integers does not have this property: the set of negative integers has no least element.

Explanations

L1 human

If some natural numbers have a property, then there is a smallest one with that property. For example, among the natural numbers that are larger than 1010 and even, the smallest is 1212. Proofs often use this: they take the smallest counterexample and show that it cannot exist.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 8 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Mathematical induction concept
  3. Natural numbers object
  4. Peano axioms concept
  5. Successor function definition
  6. Addition of natural numbers definition
  7. Order on the natural numbers definition
  8. Well-ordering principle statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-ordering_principle, lead section
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction, Relationship to the well-ordering principle