Math 2.0

statement theorem

Multinomial theorem

Statement

Let RR be a commutative ring, let x1,…,xm∈Rx_1, \dots, x_m \in R, and let nn be a natural number. Then (x1+⋯+xm)n=∑k1+⋯+km=n(nk1,…,km)x1k1⋯xmkm.(x_1 + \dots + x_m)^n = \sum_{k_1 + \dots + k_m = n} \binom{n}{k_1, \dots, k_m} x_1^{k_1} \cdots x_m^{k_m}. The sum runs over all mm-tuples (k1,…,km)(k_1, \dots, k_m) of natural numbers with sum nn, and the coefficients are multinomial coefficients.

Remarks

For m=2m = 2 it is the binomial theorem. Example: (x+y+z)2=x2+y2+z2+2xy+2yz+2xz(x + y + z)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + 2xy + 2yz + 2xz. With all xi=1x_i = 1 it gives ∑(nk1,…,km)=mn\sum \binom{n}{k_1, \dots, k_m} = m^n.

Explanations

L1 human

To expand a power of a sum of mm terms, pick one term from each of the nn factors. The monomial x1k1⋯xmkmx_1^{k_1} \cdots x_m^{k_m} appears once for each way to decide which factors give which term.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 2 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Multinomial coefficient definition
  2. Multinomial theorem statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_theorem, Theorem