Math 2.0

statement theorem

Menelaus's theorem

Statement

Let ABCABC be a triangle in the Euclidean plane R2\mathbb{R}^2. For collinear points XX, YY, ZZ with Z≠YZ \neq Y, let the signed ratio XZZY\frac{XZ}{ZY} be the real number λ\lambda with Z−X=λ (Y−Z)Z - X = \lambda\,(Y - Z). Let ℓ\ell be a line that does not pass through AA, BB or CC. Suppose that ℓ\ell meets the lines BCBC, CACA and ABAB at the points DD, EE and FF. Then AFFB⋅BDDC⋅CEEA=−1.\frac{AF}{FB} \cdot \frac{BD}{DC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EA} = -1. Conversely, let DD, EE and FF be points of the lines BCBC, CACA and ABAB, different from the vertices, with this product equal to −1-1. Then DD, EE and FF are collinear.

Remarks

With unsigned lengths, the product is 11. The converse of this weaker form is false in general. The formula differs from the formula of Ceva's theorem only in the sign. The line ℓ\ell meets the inside of exactly two sides, or of no side. Thus one or three of the ratios are negative, and the product is negative.

History

The oldest surviving statement is in the Spherics of Menelaus of Alexandria. There, he uses the plane version as a lemma for a version on the sphere. Ptolemy used the theorem in the Almagest for problems of spherical astronomy.

Explanations

L1 human

A straight line that cuts across a triangle meets the three side lines in three points. These points cut the sides in certain ratios. Going round the triangle, the product of the three signed ratios is always −1-1.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 4 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Collinear points concept
  2. Line concept
  3. Triangle concept
  4. Menelaus's theorem statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menelaus%27s_theorem, lead section
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menelaus%27s_theorem, History