Math 2.0

concept

Linearisation at an equilibrium

Summary

Let U⊆RnU \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n be open, let f:U→Rnf : U \to \mathbb{R}^n be continuously differentiable, and let x∗x^* be an equilibrium point of x′=f(x)x' = f(x). Let A=Df(x∗)A = Df(x^*) be the Jacobian matrix of ff at x∗x^*. The linearisation of the system at x∗x^* is the linear system y′=Ayy' = A y, where yy stands for x−x∗x - x^*. It comes from the first-order Taylor expansion f(x)=A(x−x∗)+o(∥x−x∗∥)f(x) = A (x - x^*) + o(\|x - x^*\|).

Remarks

If each eigenvalue of AA has negative real part, then x∗x^* is asymptotically stable for the nonlinear system. If one eigenvalue has positive real part, then x∗x^* is unstable. If some eigenvalue has zero real part and none has positive real part, the linearisation does not decide stability. For x′=−x3x' = -x^3 and x′=x3x' = x^3, the linearisation at 00 is y′=0y' = 0 in both cases, but the first is stable and the second is not. Near a hyperbolic equilibrium, the Hartman–Grobman theorem says that the linearisation describes the phase portrait up to a homeomorphism.

Explanations

L1 human

Near an equilibrium, a smooth vector field looks like a linear one. We replace the field by its best linear approximation and study the simpler linear system. This works well unless the linear system is on the border between stable and unstable.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

4 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linearization, Stability analysis
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability_theory, Non-linear autonomous systems