Math 2.0

statement proposition

Limits preserve non-strict inequalities

Statement

Let (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) be real sequences that converge to real numbers aa and bb. Assume that there is a natural number NN such that an≤bna_n \le b_n for all n≥Nn \ge N. Then a≤ba \le b.

Remarks

Strict inequalities do not pass to the limit. For example, 0<1/n0 < 1/n for all n≥1n \ge 1, but lim⁡1/n=0\lim 1/n = 0. With a constant sequence bn=cb_n = c, it says: if an≤ca_n \le c for large nn, then lim⁡an≤c\lim a_n \le c. The proof is by contradiction. If a>ba > b, take ε=(a−b)/2\varepsilon = (a - b)/2. Then for large nn we get bn<anb_n < a_n.

Explanations

L1 human

If one sequence is always below another, its limit cannot be above the limit of the other. The limits can be equal, even when the terms are never equal.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 5 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Sequence definition
  2. Real sequence definition
  3. Limit of a sequence definition
  4. Epsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequence statement
  5. Limits preserve non-strict inequalities statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_sequence, Properties