statement lemma
Discrete Grönwall inequality
Statement
Let be a sequence of real numbers with , and let and be sequences of non-negative real numbers. Assume that for each . Then for each ,
Remarks
Proof idea: by induction, . Then use . It is the discrete analogue of Grönwall's inequality, with sums in place of integrals. It bounds the growth of errors in numerical methods such as the Euler method.
Explanations
L1 human
At each step, the quantity grows at most by a factor and an extra amount . The inequality says that the total growth is at most exponential in the sum of the rates.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What this needs
To read this node, read these 3 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.
- no evidence level
- Interval concept
- Grönwall's inequality statement
- Discrete Grönwall inequality statement
What depends on this
1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.
- Euler method 0JARTXX4XP
Sources
- Web https://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/~mischler/Enseignements/M2evol2018/chap0.pdf, Lemma 5.1 and (5.4). S. Mischler, lecture notes "Chapter 0, on the Gronwall lemma", Section 5. Lemma 5.1 is the product form of the remark. With 1 + c <= e^c it gives the statement, and (5.4) is the case of a constant c_k.
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%B6nwall%27s_inequality, lead section
What links here
Used by
- Euler method 0JARTXX4XP