Math 2.0

statement theorem

Continuity via open sets

Statement

Let (X,dX)(X, d_X) and (Y,dY)(Y, d_Y) be metric spaces and let f ⁣:X→Yf \colon X \to Y be a function. Then the following two conditions are equivalent:

  1. For each a∈Xa \in X and each ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is δ>0\delta > 0 such that dX(x,a)<δd_X(x, a) < \delta implies dY(f(x),f(a))<εd_Y(f(x), f(a)) < \varepsilon for all x∈Xx \in X.
  2. For each open set VV of YY, the preimage f−1(V)f^{-1}(V) is open in XX.

Remarks

Condition 2 is the definition of a continuous map between topological spaces. Thus, for metric spaces, the epsilon-delta definition and the topological definition agree. Proof that 1 implies 2: let a∈f−1(V)a \in f^{-1}(V). Choose ε\varepsilon with B(f(a),ε)⊆VB(f(a), \varepsilon) \subseteq V, then δ\delta from condition 1. Then B(a,δ)⊆f−1(V)B(a, \delta) \subseteq f^{-1}(V). Images of open sets need not be open: the constant map R→R\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, x↦0x \mapsto 0, is continuous, but the image of R\mathbb{R} is {0}\{0\}.

Explanations

L1 human

The topological form of continuity uses only open sets and does not mention distances. This form lets us define continuity in spaces that have no metric at all.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_function, Continuous functions between metric spaces
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_function, Continuous functions between topological spaces