Math 2.0

statement theorem

Bertrand's postulate

Statement

Let nn be a positive integer. Then there is a prime number pp such that n<p≤2nn < p \le 2 n.

Remarks

For example, for n=10n = 10 the primes 11,13,17,1911, 13, 17, 19 are in the range 10<p≤2010 < p \le 20. An equivalent form: if pkp_k is the kk-th prime, then pk+1<2pkp_{k+1} < 2 p_k for each k≥1k \ge 1. The prime number theorem gives a stronger result for large nn, but Bertrand's postulate holds for each n≥1n \ge 1.

History

Joseph Bertrand stated the result as a conjecture in 1845. Chebyshev proved it in 1852.

Explanations

L1 human

Between each number and its double, there is always at least one prime. So the gap after a prime pp to the next prime is always smaller than pp.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 3 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Prime number definition
  3. Bertrand's postulate statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_postulate, lead section