Math 2.0

statement theorem

Weak law of large numbers

Statement

Let X1,X2,…X_1, X_2, \dots be i.i.d. real random variables with E[∣X1∣]<∞E[|X_1|] < \infty and μ=E[X1]\mu = E[X_1]. Let Xˉn=(X1+⋯+Xn)/n\bar{X}_n = (X_1 + \dots + X_n)/n. Then Xˉn→μ\bar{X}_n \to \mu in probability: for each ε>0\varepsilon > 0, lim⁡n→∞P(∣Xˉn−μ∣>ε)=0.\lim_{n \to \infty} P\left(\left|\bar{X}_n - \mu\right| > \varepsilon\right) = 0.

Remarks

If σ2=Var⁡(X1)<∞\sigma^2 = \operatorname{Var}(X_1) < \infty, there is a short proof. By the variance of a sum, Var⁡(Xˉn)=σ2/n\operatorname{Var}(\bar{X}_n) = \sigma^2/n. Then Chebyshev's inequality gives P(∣Xˉn−μ∣>ε)≤σ2/(nε2)→0P(|\bar{X}_n - \mu| > \varepsilon) \le \sigma^2 / (n \varepsilon^2) \to 0. The general case uses truncation, or characteristic functions: φXˉn(t)=φX1(t/n)n→eiμt\varphi_{\bar{X}_n}(t) = \varphi_{X_1}(t/n)^n \to e^{i\mu t}. The finite-variance proof needs only that the XiX_i are pairwise uncorrelated with the same mean and bounded variances.

History

Jacob Bernoulli proved the first version, for Bernoulli trials. It appeared after his death in Ars Conjectandi in 1713.

Explanations

L1 human

The weak law says that for a large number nn of trials, the sample mean is very likely to be close to the true mean. For example, in 1000010000 tosses of a fair coin, the fraction of heads is very likely to be between 0.490.49 and 0.510.51.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

2 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers, Weak law