Math 2.0

statement theorem

Moments are derivatives of the moment-generating function at zero

Statement

Let XX be a real random variable, and let h>0h > 0 with MX(t)=E[etX]<∞M_X(t) = E[e^{tX}] < \infty for all t∈(−h,h)t \in (-h, h). Then XX has finite moments of all orders, the moment-generating function MXM_X is infinitely differentiable on (−h,h)(-h, h), and for each integer k≥0k \ge 0, MX(k)(0)=E[Xk].M_X^{(k)}(0) = E\left[X^k\right]. Moreover, MX(t)=∑k=0∞E[Xk] tk/k!M_X(t) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} E[X^k] \, t^k / k! for ∣t∣<h|t| < h.

Remarks

The proof differentiates under the expectation sign. The bound ∣x∣ketx≤C(eax+e−ax)|x|^k e^{t x} \le C(e^{a x} + e^{-a x}) for ∣t∣<a<h|t| < a < h justifies this by dominated convergence. Example: for X∼Exp⁡(λ)X \sim \operatorname{Exp}(\lambda), MX(t)=λ/(λ−t)M_X(t) = \lambda/(\lambda - t), so MX′(0)=1/λM_X'(0) = 1/\lambda and MX′′(0)=2/λ2M_X''(0) = 2/\lambda^2. So Var⁡(X)=1/λ2\operatorname{Var}(X) = 1/\lambda^2.

Explanations

L1 human

This result is the reason for the name: the function "generates" the moments. To find E[Xk]E[X^k], you take the kk-th derivative of MXM_X and put t=0t = 0.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_generating_function, Calculations of moments