statement theorem
Implicit function theorem
Statement
Let be open, and let be of class C^1, written with and . Let with . Suppose that the matrix is invertible. Then there are open sets and with and , and a unique function with the following property. For , if and only if . The function is of class , and for each .
Remarks
Here is the matrix of partial derivatives with respect to . Together, and form the Jacobian matrix of . For and with , the solution near is . At , , and no such function exists. One proof applies the inverse function theorem to . If is of class , then is of class . The theorem has a long history. Cauchy gave the first rigorous form, and Dini extended the real version to any number of variables.
Explanations
L1 human
An equation often defines as a function of , even when you cannot solve it with a formula. The theorem says this works near a solution, provided really depends on there, in the sense that is invertible.
What this node needs for W2
- edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
- edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
- edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
- explanation L2 (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What depends on this
4 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.
- Lagrange multiplier with one constraint 04A2XEX4D4
- Implicit function theorem for a surjective derivative 0NE2W2XPQJ
- Implicit differentiation 0QKA345AW1
- Lagrange multipliers 0VKKP8X6Q6
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_function_theorem, Statement of the theorem
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_function_theorem, History
What links here
Used by
- Implicit function theorem for a surjective derivative 0NE2W2XPQJ
- Implicit differentiation 0QKA345AW1
- Lagrange multipliers 0VKKP8X6Q6