Math 2.0

example

Base rate fallacy

Example

A disease affects 1%1\% of a population. A test is positive for 90%90\% of the sick people and for 9%9\% of the healthy people. Let SS be the event "sick" and TT the event "positive test". Then P(S)=0.01P(S) = 0.01, P(T∣S)=0.9P(T \mid S) = 0.9 and P(T∣Sc)=0.09P(T \mid S^c) = 0.09. By the law of total probability, P(T)=0.9⋅0.01+0.09⋅0.99=0.0981P(T) = 0.9 \cdot 0.01 + 0.09 \cdot 0.99 = 0.0981. By Bayes' theorem, P(S∣T)=0.009/0.0981≈0.092P(S \mid T) = 0.009 / 0.0981 \approx 0.092. So only about 9%9\% of the people with a positive test are sick. This is true although the test is right for 90%90\% of the sick and for 91%91\% of the healthy.

Remarks

The base rate fallacy is the error to ignore the base rate P(S)P(S) and to take P(S∣T)P(S \mid T) to be close to P(T∣S)P(T \mid S). When the condition is rare, most positive results are false positives, even for a good test.

Explanations

L1 human

Among 1000010000 people, 100100 are sick and 9090 of them test positive. Of the 99009900 healthy people, 891891 also test positive. So of the 981981 positive tests, only 9090 come from sick people.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or not_instance_of or illustrates out (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy, False positive paradox